Navigate
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Interviews
    • Live Discussions
    • Podcast
    • Talks
  • Topics
    • Apologetics
    • Epistemology
    • Free Stuff
    • God
    • Moral Argument
    • Naturalism
    • Reformed Epistemology
    • Science
    • Street Epistemology
    • Theology
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Events
  • Shop
  • Free Resources
  • FAQ
  • Get in Touch
  • Testimonials
  • Donate?
  • Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • SoundCloud
    • YouTube
Capturing Christianity
0
0
374K
0
Capturing Christianity Capturing Christianity
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Topics
    • Apologetics
    • EAAN
    • Epistemology
    • Faith
    • Interviews
    • Live Discussion
    • Moral Argument
    • Naturalism
    • Science
    • Street Epistemology
    • Theology
    • Reformed Epistemology
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Events
  • Shop
  • Info
    • FAQ
    • Testimonials
  • Get in Touch
  • Donate
0
abductive moral argument
  • Interviews

Interview: Tyler McNabb Presents an Abductive Moral Argument

  • July 14, 2017
  • No comments
  • 2 minute read
  • 2.3K views
  • Cameron Bertuzzi
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

In Part 3 of my interview with him, Dr. Tyler McNabb presents an abdutive moral argument. Moral Arguments for God generally take the form:

(1) If God does not exist, objective moral values and duties do not exist.
(2) Objective moral values and duties do exist (e.g.: it’s objectively wrong to torture infants for fun).
(3) God exists.

Believe it or not, some atheists actually reject (2). They hold that morality is person or culture relative. It’s not objectively wrong to torture infants for fun. What the Nazi’s did to the Jews at Auschwitz wasn’t objectively wrong. If the moral argument can push an atheist into this kind of moral nihilism, I’d say that’s a significant accomplishment in itself.

Other atheists that have a bit more common sense accept (2), but deny (1). They hold that objective moral values and duties can exist on atheism. Eric Wielenberg is one such atheist. He holds that moral facts are grounded Platonically. That is to say, they exist as abstract objects. No God needed. The theist can respond in one of two ways. One option is to argue that moral facts can’t be grounded Plantonically. That route is going to be a little difficult. The other option is to concede the point that this view is possible, but it does a poor job of explaining all the various aspects of morality as we experience it.

Dr. McNabb essentially defends this second option in part 3 of our interview. He presents an abductive moral argument. Tyler argues that theistically grounded ethics is a better explanation of our moral experience than Platonism. Feel free to watch it below and share your thoughts!

Tyler McNabb is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy (Humanities) at Houston Baptist University. His specialization is in epistemology and philosophy of religion. In combining these two topics, his current focus has been on defending both proper functionalism and the project of Reformed Epistemology. In addition to his research, he also enjoys teaching, reading theology, witnessing, watching The Walking Dead, and eating Mexican food.

Part 1 – – Part 2 – – Part 3

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
T A G S
  • Apologetics
  • Moral Argument
  • Tyler McNabb
Cameron Bertuzzi

Cameron is a professional photographer and founder of Capturing Christianity, a ministry aimed at exposing the intellectual side of Christian belief. He is a writer, speaker, and uses his ministry to host discussions and interviews on Christian Apologetics. Cameron is married to a beautiful wife and is the father of two adorable children.

SUBSCRIBE. BE AWESOME.

Get updates on new posts, upcoming live discussions, and more.

You May Also Like
View Post
  • Interviews

The Moral Character of the Christian Apologist with Dr. Douglas Groothuis

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • January 31, 2019
Pascal's Wager
View Post
  • Interviews
  • Podcast

CC013: Is Pascal’s Wager Sound? with Dr. Michael Rota (Part 2)

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • November 26, 2018
View Post
  • Interviews
  • Podcast

CC012: Is Pascal’s Wager Sound? with Dr. Michael Rota (Part 1)

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • November 12, 2018
View Post
  • Interviews
  • Podcast

CC009: Was Jesus Copied From Pagan Myth?

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • August 21, 2018
View Post
  • Interviews
  • Podcast

CC008: Tim McGrew and I Critique Street Epistemology

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • July 20, 2018
Jerry Walls
View Post
  • Interviews

Answering 5 Big Objections to Christianity with Dr. Jerry Walls

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • July 7, 2018
View Post
  • Interviews

Is the Ontological Argument Sound? An Interview with Dr. Ben Arbour

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • April 17, 2018
Richard Swinburne
View Post
  • Interviews

My Interview and Portraits of Richard Swinburne

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • March 14, 2018
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
about
Free 60-page eBook!
Join our super cool email list to receive a copy of our free 60-page eBook (and other cool stuff). Btw, Christianity is true.
Subscribe!
Support
If you find value in our content, prayerfully consider supporting us monthly on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!
Follow Us!
Facebook 0
Twitter 0
YouTube 374K
Instagram 0
Capturing Christianity
  • Home
  • Free Stuff
  • FAQ
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Donate?

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

wpDiscuz