Navigate
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Interviews
    • Live Discussions
    • Podcast
    • Talks
  • Topics
    • Apologetics
    • Epistemology
    • Free Stuff
    • God
    • Moral Argument
    • Naturalism
    • Reformed Epistemology
    • Science
    • Street Epistemology
    • Theology
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Events
  • Shop
  • Free Resources
  • FAQ
  • Get in Touch
  • Testimonials
  • Donate?
  • Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • SoundCloud
    • YouTube
Capturing Christianity
0
0
374K
0
Capturing Christianity Capturing Christianity
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Topics
    • Apologetics
    • EAAN
    • Epistemology
    • Faith
    • Interviews
    • Live Discussion
    • Moral Argument
    • Naturalism
    • Science
    • Street Epistemology
    • Theology
    • Reformed Epistemology
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Events
  • Shop
  • Info
    • FAQ
    • Testimonials
  • Get in Touch
  • Donate
0
  • Discussions

Is There Really “No Evidence” For God? Tom Jump vs Dr. Josh Rasmussen

  • March 7, 2019
  • 5 comments
  • 2 minute read
  • 4.7K views
  • Cameron Bertuzzi
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

Some atheists believe that there’s no evidence for God’s existence. That’s the topic of this live discussion. Is it true that there’s literally no evidence for God? Is it possible to defend such a thing?

This live discussion is hosted on YouTube. It’s completely free to watch. Click on the YouTube link in the embedded video below and subscribe to our channel if you’d like to participate in the live chat (or click here).

Live Discussion


Dr. Josh Rasmussen

Joshua Rasmussen, Ph.D., is an associate professor of philosophy at Azusa Pacific University. His area of expertise is analytic metaphysics, with a focus on the foundations of existence and the philosophy of mind. He is author of Defending the Correspondence Theory of Truth, Necessary Existence (with Pruss), The Bridge of Reason, and How Reason Leads to God (forthcoming). Rasmussen values collaboration across disciplines and perspectives.

Check out his website here. He also has a really cool website that asks a series of questions that determine whether you’re already, perhaps unknowingly, committed to the existence of a necessary being. Take the survey and find out for yourself!

Tom Jump

Tom Jump

My name is Tom Jump. I wrote an epistemology and model of objective morality and I created a YouTube channel where I have debates and conversations with professors, philosophers, cosmologists, and academic theologians proficient in each of the relevant fields to my epistemology, where I demonstrate just how effective my models are at countering apologist arguments.

Links:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/TJump_
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TJump
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/TJump/creators

If you’d like to help ensure we continue to create amazing content, support us on Patreon! Any amount helps. We literally can’t do this without you.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
T A G S
  • Apologetics
  • Atheism
  • Evidence
  • Theism
Cameron Bertuzzi

Cameron is a professional photographer and founder of Capturing Christianity, a ministry aimed at exposing the intellectual side of Christian belief. He is a writer, speaker, and uses his ministry to host discussions and interviews on Christian Apologetics. Cameron is married to a beautiful wife and is the father of two adorable children.

SUBSCRIBE. BE AWESOME.

Get updates on new posts, upcoming live discussions, and more.

You May Also Like
View Post
  • Discussions

Hell Debate: Does the Bible Teach ECT or Annihilationism? Chris Date vs James Martin

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • January 17, 2019
View Post
  • Discussions

Two Philosophers Debate the Ethics of Sex – Tim Hsiao vs Benjamin Watkins

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • November 30, 2018
the euthyphro dilemma
View Post
  • Discussions

The Euthyphro Dilemma, Matt Flannagan vs Jason Thibodeau

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • September 22, 2018
Andrew Harland-Smith
View Post
  • Discussions

Is Molinism True? Andrew Harland-Smith vs John Limanto

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • August 24, 2018
View Post
  • Discussions

Cosmic Skeptic and Inspiring Philosophy Discuss The Moral Argument

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • July 20, 2018
View Post
  • Discussions

Live Discussion: Graham Oppy, Ben Arbour on Ontological Arguments

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • July 18, 2018
View Post
  • Discussions

Street Epistemologist vs Professional Philosopher: Can We Know that God Exists?

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • May 31, 2018
View Post
  • Discussions

Luke Barnes & Alex Malpass Discuss The Fine-Tuning Argument

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • April 18, 2018
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Barry
Barry
6 years ago

Hello, I’m an atheist. I would argue that since ‘god’, as used in traditional religious parlance, constitutes an incoherent concept, there can never be any more “evidence” for god than there could be for other propositions that are also incoherent. I guess the biggest problem I have is not with liberal theists who live and let live, but with the fundamentalist Christians who overstate their case, and insult our intelligence by pretending that we secretly accept god’s existence, but are too sinful to admit it out in the open…all because of what Romans 1:20 says. There are two responses mature… Read more »

1
Reply
Erik Nelson
Erik Nelson
6 years ago
Reply to  Barry

What created the fabric of space time and all the matter and energy reverberating around within it?

0
Reply
Barry
Barry
6 years ago
Reply to  Erik Nelson

Creation of time logically necessitates the conclusion that there was a time before time, a logical fallacy. Thus time wasn’t created. And all biblical descriptions of heaven present God going about his business in the same type of temporal progression of events that characterizes us on earth. So you run into serious problems if you wish to push the created nature of “time”, you’d be saying God created himself. As as far space being created, I deny the big bang, as do some anti-evolution creationist organizations like Answers in Genesis and ICR. I believe the universe is an infinite field,… Read more »

0
Reply
Matt Smith
Matt Smith
6 years ago
Reply to  Barry

Just a small point, there’s no need to deny the Big Bang to make your point valid. For one thing, all we know for certain about it is that it was an expansion of our local observable spacetime at some finite point in the past. We don’t know it was the ‘beginning’ of the entire Universe, not by a long shot.

Nobody knows what preceded this expansion phase, and we know our current mathematical models are incomplete (quantum gravity, anyone?) So anyone speaking with certainty about this apparent boundary a finite time ago is jumping to unwarranted conclusions.

2
Reply
Darren
Darren
5 years ago

Matt Dillahunty addresses this fairly well. It would be fun to see him on the show.

https://youtu.be/wLfSa0w1vV8

0
Reply
about
Free 60-page eBook!
Join our super cool email list to receive a copy of our free 60-page eBook (and other cool stuff). Btw, Christianity is true.
Subscribe!
Support
If you find value in our content, prayerfully consider supporting us monthly on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!
Follow Us!
Facebook 0
Twitter 0
YouTube 374K
Instagram 0
Capturing Christianity
  • Home
  • Free Stuff
  • FAQ
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Donate?

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

wpDiscuz