Navigate
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Interviews
    • Live Discussions
    • Podcast
    • Talks
  • Topics
    • Apologetics
    • Epistemology
    • Free Stuff
    • God
    • Moral Argument
    • Naturalism
    • Reformed Epistemology
    • Science
    • Street Epistemology
    • Theology
  • Events
    • CCv1 Conference
  • Shop
  • Free Resources
  • FAQ
  • Get in Touch
  • Testimonials
  • Donate?
  • Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • SoundCloud
    • YouTube
Capturing Christianity
28K
12K
93K
9K
Capturing Christianity Capturing Christianity
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Topics
    • Apologetics
    • EAAN
    • Epistemology
    • Faith
    • Interviews
    • Live Discussion
    • Moral Argument
    • Naturalism
    • Science
    • Street Epistemology
    • Theology
    • Reformed Epistemology
  • Events
    • CCv1 Conference
  • Shop
  • Info
    • FAQ
    • Testimonials
  • Get in Touch
  • Donate
negative apologetics
  • Articles

Defending Christianity: Kierkegaard’s 3 Stages of Life

  • October 4, 2017
  • One comment
  • 4 minute read
  • 7K views
  • Cameron Bertuzzi
loading...

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

Instead of aiming to provide arguments for the truth of Christianity, Negative Apologetics examines the disastrous consequences that would result if Christianity were false. In this sense, Negative Apologetics resembles existentialism. The Danish existentialist Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) famously thought that life is lived on three different stages or planes: Aesthetic, Ethical, and Religious. Kierkegaard’s apologetic is one of the best exemplifications of Negative Apologetics. We’ll examine each to see why.

Stage 1: Aesthetic

The first stage on life’s way, according to Kierkegaard, is the Aesthetic. This is the stage of sensuality and pleasure. The aesthete seeks to defeat boredom by maximizing pleasure. Man at this stage needn’t be hedonistic; he can be cultivated and reflective. Nevertheless, life revolves around sex, money, art, music, anything that brings personal enjoyment. He is ruled by his passions.

The problem is that ‘this-worldly pleasure’ is ephemeral. A life defined by fleeting pleasures is one in constant motion. There’s no solid framework from which to operate. Decision making is built on a foundation of incoherence and inconsistency. Eventually the pleasures of aesthetics wear thin and man becomes bored of fighting boredom. Despair, rather than happiness, is found at this stage.

Stage 2: Ethical

The second stage on life’s way is the Ethical. When the pleasures of aesthetics wear thin, one must seek ethical pleasures instead. The ethical life is built on a foundation of morality. Life is no longer about satisfying personal passions, but rather about satisfying the demands of moral obligations (be it absolute or cultural). At this stage, moral conformity becomes the greatest good.

The problem here is that a transitional leap from the aesthetic to the ethical ends in a worse kind of dissatisfaction than boredom. In the second stage of life, man learns that he cannot live up to the demands of morality. The more he tries to conform and do what is required of him, the more he is made painfully aware that he cannot. The ethical life ends in crushing guilt and utter despair.

Stage 3: Religious

The third and most progressive stage, according to Kierkegaard, is the Religious. Once we understand that we are destined to sin, we can understand there’s only one way out. Through faith, we can come to embrace forgiveness of sin and enter into a personal relationship with God. “If we can accept God’s forgiveness, sincerely, inwardly, contritely, with gratitude and hope, then we open ourselves to the joyous prospect of beginning anew.” (source)

Some believe that for Kierkegaard, the transition from the ethical stage of life to the religious is a leap of faith, a criterion-less choice. This is because Christian dogma is characterized by absurdity [1]. Unless man makes this criterion-less leap, his own existence will be characterized by absurdity. His life will remain in utter despair.

Kierkegaard was in essence saying, “In this life there are two choices: Either live a life of despair (stages 1&2), or embrace the absurd (stage 3) and live a life of fulfillment.”

Assessment

The first important thing to note in our assessment is that, as explained above, Kierkegaard believed that “reason” and faith were in some way at odds with one another [1]. While there were prominent Christians that held a similar view in the past (see Wittgenstein, Pascal, and William James), it isn’t endorsed by many contemporary Christian philosophers. So even if Kierkegaard actually thought that the religious stage of life requires embracing the logically absurd, that isn’t something Christians are necessarily committed to (this is also relevant).

The second important observation is that the first 2 stages are compatible with atheistic moral realism. In other words, Kierkegaard’s Negative Apologetic doesn’t depend on establishing that atheism entails moral relativism; it’s just as strong against the atheist that affirms objective moral values and duties. So even if the intrinsic value of human beings can be squared with blind evolutionary forces, the atheistic life (characterized by stages 1&2) still ends in despair. Aesthetic pleasures in life eventually grow thin. A life built on fleeting pleasures is bound for incoherence and boredom. Likewise, the person that consistently and pursuantly conforms to the standards of morality, even on atheism, will inevitably discover that it can’t actually be done. The ethical life is impossible to live.

Whatever stage the atheist finds themselves in, the only solution is the embrace of Christianity. However, and importantly, this needn’t be at the cost of embracing “absurdity.” There are good reasons to think that Christianity is true (see here and here).

Conclusion

Kierkegaard’s Negative Apologetic closely resembles a common way of presenting the Gospel. In Tactics, Greg Koukl presents the Gospel to a lawyer by (a) establishing the belief that wrong-doing deserves punishment and (b) getting the lawyer to admit that he’d done wrong things and therefore deserved punishment. Christianity provides a succinct solution to this problem. Jesus came and died for us, He bore our sins and endured the pain and suffering we deserved as punishment so that we can be reconciled with the Father. Kierkegaard called this absurdity, I call it love.


[1] What precisely Kierkegaard meant by the term “absurd” is a matter of debate. Is faith reasonless? Is faith above reason? It is beyond reason? For more, check this book out.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
T A G S
  • Kierkegaard
  • Negative Apologetics
Cameron Bertuzzi

Cameron is a professional photographer and founder of Capturing Christianity, a ministry aimed at exposing the intellectual side of Christian belief. He is a writer, speaker, and uses his ministry to host discussions and interviews on Christian Apologetics. Cameron is married to a beautiful wife and is the father of two adorable children.

SUBSCRIBE. BE AWESOME.

Get updates on new posts, upcoming live discussions, and more.

You May Also Like
abductive moral argument
View Post
  • Articles

Dr. Andrew Loke’s Opening Statement vs. Paulogia

  • Andrew Loke
  • March 29, 2021
View Post
  • Articles

CCv1 Apologetics Conference

  • Cameron Bertuzzi
  • March 1, 2021
The Mirror or the Mask
View Post
  • Articles

Short Review: The Mirror or the Mask? (Lydia McGrew)

  • Anonymous
  • July 6, 2020
View Post
  • Articles

Two (More) Arguments for Substance Dualism

  • Dustin Crummett
  • February 28, 2020
View Post
  • Articles

Do Humans Have “Souls”? Yes, For Two Reasons

  • Dustin Crummett
  • February 14, 2020
View Post
  • Articles

The “Zombie Argument” for Property Dualism

  • Dustin Crummett
  • January 31, 2020
Nativity Scene
View Post
  • Articles

3 Solid Reasons to Trust the Christmas Story

  • Josh Parikh
  • December 23, 2019
View Post
  • Articles

Dualism, Physicalism, and Philosophy of Mind

  • Dustin Crummett
  • December 11, 2019
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael
Michael
5 months ago

Wouldn’t it be true to say that if

“The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved, it is the power of God”

Then Kierkegaard’s assessment of embracing absurdity, from the perspective of being at stage 2 (not 3), is correct? Being that absurdity == foolishness?

0
Reply
about
Free 60-page eBook!
Join our super cool email list to receive a copy of our free 60-page eBook (and other cool stuff). Btw, Christianity is true.
Subscribe!
Trending Posts
  • abductive moral argument 1
    Dr. Andrew Loke’s Opening Statement vs. Paulogia
    • 63
    • 38 min
    • 1.1K
  • 2
    CCv1 Apologetics Conference
    • 0
    • 1 min
    • 934
Support
If you find value in our content, prayerfully consider supporting us monthly on Patreon!
Follow Us!
Facebook 28K
Twitter 12K
YouTube 93K
Instagram 9K

SUBSCRIBE. BE AWESOME.

Get updates on new posts, upcoming discussions, and more!

Follow Us!
28K
12K
93K
9K
Random Posts
  • why is there so much suffering
    If God Exists, Why is There so Much Suffering?
    • 5 min
    • 3.2K
  • does the bible contain errors
    Does the Bible Contain Errors? Analyzing Biblical Inerrancy
    • 3 min
    • 3.4K
  • The Moral Character of the Christian Apologist with Dr. Douglas Groothuis
    • 2 min
    • 1.9K
  • How to Respond to Alleged Old Testament Atrocities
    • 7 min
    • 6.7K
Topics
Advice (2) Annihilationism (2) Apologetics (79) Atheism (6) Atheology (3) Bible (5) Book Review (6) Christmas (2) Contingency Argument (3) Discussions (2) Divine Hiddenness (3) EAAN (4) Empty Tomb (2) Epistemology (20) Evolution (2) Faith (5) Fine-tuning (4) Free Stuff (2) Genesis (7) God (5) Hell (2) Interviews (6) Jesus (7) Live Discussion (15) Moral Argument (12) Naturalism (3) Objections (3) Old Testament (2) Ontological Argument (3) Outsider Test (3) Personal (2) Philosophy (2) Plantinga (5) Podcast (8) Probability (3) Problem of Evil (2) Reformed Epistemology (11) Religious Diversity (3) Resurrection (11) Science (7) Street Epistemology (16) Theology (24) Tyler McNabb (3) Warrant (2) William Lane Craig (2)
Advanced Search
Calendar
April 2021
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar    

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

wpDiscuz