Navigate
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Interviews
    • Live Discussions
    • Podcast
    • Talks
  • Topics
    • Apologetics
    • Epistemology
    • Free Stuff
    • God
    • Moral Argument
    • Naturalism
    • Reformed Epistemology
    • Science
    • Street Epistemology
    • Theology
  • Shop
  • Free Resources
  • FAQ
  • Get in Touch
  • Testimonials
  • Donate?
  • Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • SoundCloud
    • YouTube
Capturing Christianity

Exposing the Intellectual Side of Christian Belief

Capturing Christianity Capturing Christianity
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Topics
    • Apologetics
    • EAAN
    • Epistemology
    • Faith
    • Interviews
    • Live Discussion
    • Moral Argument
    • Naturalism
    • Science
    • Street Epistemology
    • Theology
    • Reformed Epistemology
  • Shop
  • Info
    • FAQ
    • Testimonials
  • Get in Touch
  • Donate
  • Articles

No Theology, No Apologetics

  • October 6, 2018
  • No comments
  • 4 minute read
  • 1.9K views
  • Brett Lunn
Total
6
Shares
6
0
0

Always be prepared to give a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you. This paraphrase of 1 Peter 3:15 is commonly cited as a basis for apologetics. After all, you are giving a defense and it is about the faith. That is basically the definition of apologetics. Here I want to highlight a different aspect of the verse.

This is a defense of the faith. It is giving a reason for the hope that is in you. In order to do that, we need to know what the faith is, what our hope is. When Polycarp was being burned alive for not offering incense to the emperor, he would not have set the same example if his reason for refusing was that Jesus thought incense was smelly. Instead, his martyrdom was grounded in the fact that Jesus is Lord of all and that we should worship no other so-called god or lord. This is why he asks rhetorically, “How can I blaspheme my King and my Savior?”

So if you are interested in apologetics, you need to know theology. This is part and parcel of apologetics. Do you know theology well? The point is not to get bogged down in all of the particulars and different traditions. Do you have a good grasp of the broad contours of theology?

The Trinity

After all, theology is important in order to know what needs to be defended and what does not. Take the doctrine of the Trinity as an example. If someone thought this meant that we believe in three gods (the heresy of tritheism), then Christians would have to defend polytheism in their apologetics. On the other hand, if they thought the Trinity meant that the Father transformed into the Son who transformed into the Spirit (the heresy of modalism), then that view would need to be defended.

Unless one thinks this example means everyone already know the broad contours, let me provide an example that is more complicated. In “Understanding Omnipotence,” Pearce and Pruss analyze omnipotence in terms of perfect freedom of will and perfect efficacy of will. Does this analysis create a problem for the Christian due to God’s triunity? As Pruss writes in “A Gödelian Ontological Argument Improved Even More,” “But there cannot be two beings with perfect freedom and an efficacious will. For if they are perfectly free, they will be able to will incompatible propositions to be true, and then one of their wills shall have to fail to be efficacious.” So does this analysis of omnipotence combine with God’s triunity to prove that Christians have a contradiction on their hands?

This would be true according to how the Trinity is often thought about. Under this view, each person of the Trinity has a distinct will. Thus, there are three wills in the Triune God. Minimally, one sees this in extreme forms of social Trinitarianism. So for many laypeople and even some philosophers and theologians, there is a problem here. However, the historic faith has taught that the will is according to the essence or nature, so the Triune God only has one will. As Pruss notes immediately after, “This argument assumes that we are individuating beings in such a way that distinct beings with will have their own will. If God is a Trinity, the persons of the Trinity do not have distinct wills, and hence will not count as distinct beings in our sense.” [1]

Summing Up

Those who are aware of Christian theology do not need to twist themselves in philosophical knots in order to defend the Christian faith. Instead, a solution is immediately at hand. So if you want to do apologetics, you need to learn theology. You should be growing in your knowledge of the Bible and theology continually, so this is only an added emphasis. If you are pursuing apologetics without learning more about God’s word by understanding the Bible and theology, then you have made an idol. Where your treasure is, there is your heart.

So take heed and repent. Life is more than winning arguments or learning syllogisms. God promises us nothing less than fuller communion with Him. No theology, no apologetics.

Resources

I suggest the following short books:

(1) For theology, see Christian Dogmatics (eds. Allen and Swain). This comes from a more Reformed perspective, but it is short and solid.

(2) For an overview of the biblical storyline and major themes, see From Eden to the New Jerusalem (Alexander).

Do not write off reading these books. If you read at an average pace, you can read both books over the course of a month by reading for thirty minutes per day. You have the time. Trust me. If you do not believe me, look at either iPhone’s new Screen Time or download the app Moment.


Notes

[1] Emphasis original.

If you enjoyed reading this article, consider supporting us on Patreon!

Total
6
Shares
Share 6
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
T A G S
  • Apologetics
  • Theology
  • Trinity
Brett Lunn

Brett Lunn is pursuing a Master of Divinity degree in Christian Ministry through Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is interested in biblical studies, theology, philosophy, and more. He blogs at brettlunn.wordpress.com.

SUBSCRIBE. BE AWESOME.

Get updates on new posts, upcoming live discussions, and more.

You May Also Like
The Mirror or the Mask
View Post
  • Articles

Short Review: The Mirror or the Mask? (Lydia McGrew)

  • Brett Lunn
  • July 6, 2020
View Post
  • Articles

Two (More) Arguments for Substance Dualism

  • Dustin Crummett
  • February 28, 2020
View Post
  • Articles

Do Humans Have “Souls”? Yes, For Two Reasons

  • Dustin Crummett
  • February 14, 2020
View Post
  • Articles

The “Zombie Argument” for Property Dualism

  • Dustin Crummett
  • January 31, 2020
Nativity Scene
View Post
  • Articles

3 Solid Reasons to Trust the Christmas Story

  • Josh Parikh
  • December 23, 2019
View Post
  • Articles

Dualism, Physicalism, and Philosophy of Mind

  • Dustin Crummett
  • December 11, 2019
View Post
  • Articles

Is Bart Ehrman Right When He Says Half of Paul’s Letters are Forgeries?

  • Erik Manning
  • December 4, 2019
View Post
  • Articles

Are the Gospels “Hopelessly Contradictory”?

  • Erik Manning
  • October 23, 2019
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
about
Free 60-page eBook!
Join our super cool email list to receive a copy of our free 60-page eBook (and other cool stuff). Btw, Christianity is true.
Subscribe!
Support
If you find value in our content, prayerfully consider supporting us monthly on Patreon!
Follow Us!
Facebook 23K
Twitter 10K
YouTube 50K
Instagram 3K

SUBSCRIBE. BE AWESOME.

Get updates on new posts, upcoming discussions, and more!

Follow Us!
23K
10K
50K
3K
Random Posts
  • An Abductive Moral Argument (Part 1, Introduction)
    • 5 min
    • 2.2K
  • street epistemology
    How to Respond to Street Epistemology
    • 8 min
    • 13.5K
  • What Can Biology Teach Us About Genesis?
    • 8 min
    • 1.9K
  • Andrew Harland-Smith
    Is Molinism True? Andrew Harland-Smith vs John Limanto
    • 2 min
    • 1.3K
Topics
Advice (2) Annihilationism (2) Apologetics (79) Atheism (6) Atheology (3) Bible (5) Book Review (6) Contingency Argument (3) Discussions (2) Divine Hiddenness (3) EAAN (4) Empty Tomb (2) Epistemology (20) Evolution (2) Faith (5) Fine-tuning (4) Free Stuff (2) Genesis (7) God (5) Hell (2) Interviews (6) Jesus (7) Live Discussion (15) Mike Almeida (2) Moral Argument (12) Naturalism (3) Objections (3) Old Testament (2) Ontological Argument (3) Outsider Test (3) Personal (2) Philosophy (2) Plantinga (5) Podcast (8) Probability (3) Problem of Evil (2) Reformed Epistemology (11) Religious Diversity (3) Resurrection (11) Science (7) Street Epistemology (16) Theology (24) Tyler McNabb (3) Warrant (2) William Lane Craig (2)
Advanced Search
Calendar
January 2021
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Jul    

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

wpDiscuz